@article {80546,
	title = {Using raw regional climate model outputs for quantifying climate change impacts on hydrology},
	journal = {Hydrological Processes},
	volume = {31},
	number = {24},
	year = {2017},
	note = {This is a look at regional climate models (RCMs) and their use in predicting the responses of watersheds to climate change.  In this paper, three {\textquotedblleft}RCMs driven by three different general circulation models are used to investigate the uncertainty of hydrological simulations associated with the choice of a bias-corrected or nonbias-corrected RCM simulation. The results indicate that the uncertainty envelope is generally watershed and indicator dependent.{\textquotedblright}  In order to allow users to make the most informed decisions, the authors recommend giving both the bias-corrected and nonbias-corrected data.},
	month = {2017, Nov. 30},
	pages = {p.4398-4413},
	keywords = {Umpqua River Basin, Yellowstone River Basin, Yampa River Basin, Manic 5 River Basin,  hydrology, climate, precipitation, temperature, mathematical modeling},
	doi = {DOI: 10.1002/hyp11368},
	author = {Chen, Jie and Brissette, Fran{\c c}ois P. and Liu, Pan and Xia, Jun}
}
